How is robotic hair transplantation done in Turkey via the ARTAS device?
Robotic hair transplantation in Turkey via ARTAS device
It is a method that mainly depends on the extraction of the follicle unit (FUE) for hair transplantation, but it is performed by a robot under the supervision of a doctor, to obtain more accurate results, but most of the time the follicles are transplanted by the doctor.
Robotic hair transplantation in Turkey is similar to FUE hair transplant. Once you arrive at the center, the hair in the donor area will be cut to facilitate identification and extraction of the follicles.
You'll be seated and have several anesthesia injections to make sure your scalp is completely numb. Then a skin tightening is placed on the head around the donor area to ensure easy access to the follicles.
Artas uses cameras to map the donor area and select the best follicles to extract based on the characteristics of the hair.
The robotic arm then removes individual hair follicles, which the doctor will later implant manually, (most of the time).
An experienced doctor is available at all times, to make any necessary adjustments and to ensure that the procedure runs as smoothly as possible.
The differences between robotic hair transplantation and hair transplantation Direct by Choi Pens
As mentioned before, performing a robotic hair transplant in Turkey is similar to using the advanced Choi FUE pen (FUE) hair transplant method. But what does this mean?
FUE - This method is based on removing individual follicles from the donor area and transplanting them to the desired area.
- The stages of FUE hair transplantation and the steps in which the robot participates.
- Frontal line mapping stage.
Frontal line determination by laser
At this stage, the area to be transplanted is examined, the frontal line is determined, and accordingly, a decision is made about the number of hairs to be extracted.
- Extraction stage, where in this stage the follicles are extracted from the side or back area of the head.
- channel opening stage.
- implantation stage.
It is possible to add a fifth stage, which is a stage platelet rich plasma injection In the scalp if the patient so desires. You can view it and know the results of studies about it on our page.
There are two types of ARTAS robot, one of which performs these four stages in full, and it is the newest type, while the other, which is the most common, only performs the first two stages, which is to determine the frontal line and to extract hair from the donor area.
Advantages of robotic hair transplantation in Turkey / Istanbul
View results before robotic hair transplantation in Turkey
- Offers digital maps superior to the human eye. This makes it easier to choose the right grafts, which makes the transplant process look healthier. It also displays the expected results, and accordingly, a complex software is used to determine the number of follicles to be removed.
- Less scars. Thanks to the process of extracting the follicles individually and randomly from the donor area, the scarring is minimal.
- Better selection of follicles means fewer grafts are needed.
- Shorter recovery period. Robotic hair transplantation in Turkey may be on the point of recovery, as by the end of your trip you will be able to go back to work directly.
Disadvantages of robotic hair transplantation in Turkey
- Robots are not able to make judgments like humans do, so you will still need a good doctor to help the robot.
- Since the technology is still quite new, robotic hair transplants are only available to patients with straight, dark hair. Because the robot cannot distinguish revealing hair colors such as blonde and red.
- For those who have lost a lot of hair, this procedure may not be appropriate. Because some robots extract follicles from the back and sides of the head only.
- The chances of harvested follicles maintaining their vitality are not great. The Artas device has a rate of about 90%, while a well-experienced hair transplant doctor will have a rate of 97%.
The difference between ARTAS or NeoGraft robotics
Initially, both devices were manufactured by the same company, VENUS TREATMENT.
ARTAS Robotic and NeoGraft have many in common. Both are minimally invasive, have a quick recovery time compared to other hair transplant methods, and do not require general anesthesia. Both techniques are FDA approved, and with both methods, a surgeon or technician manually transplants hair follicles into their new location.
Robotic hair transplantation mechanism in Turkey
Comparison of Hair Transplant in Artas and Neugraft: How do they differ
While ARTAS and NeoGraft both use the Follicular Unit Extraction or FUE method of hair extraction, there is one key difference: During the NeoGraft procedure, the technician or doctor manually harvests hair from the donor area of the patient's scalp, while the process is done automatically. With the ARTAS robot via a computer-controlled robotic arm. Another major difference is that the ARTAS robot system contains a computer that, after examining the area to be transplanted, determines the number and quality of follicles to be extracted rather than the human being, which can greatly speed up the process.
Is ARTAS or NeoGraft hair transplant better?
To answer this question, let's take a look at the pros and cons of ARTAS vs NeoGraft hair transplantation.
Where Artas is characterized by speed. It is impossible for a human to beat a computer that can perform thousands of calculations per second. The Artas system selects the best hair follicles for transplantation based on a complex algorithm. This way you can reduce up to 50% of the time it takes to manually extract your hair. Both ARTAS and NeoGraft use the same method of implantation – via a special machine that is manually operated by a technician or surgeon.
Studies on ARTAS robotic hair transplantation
suggest some Studies Which compared the conventional implants with robotic implants, where studies concluded that its usefulness lies in reducing the scars resulting from implants in addition to increasing the speed of implantation.
There are some types of implant robots today, but they are not widely used by clinicians due to the need to develop them.